New Video: Genetically Engineering Pigs to Reduce Environmental Pollution

In this very short video - Genetically Engineering Pigs to Reduce Environmental Pollution - I look at how genetically engineering a pig has produced an animal that is less harmful to the environment.

The problem of phosphate pollution in the runoff from farms, particularly in pig farming, is a significant environmental concern. Animals' diets are often rich in grains, which contain phytic acid, a compound that pigs cannot digest due to the absence of a specific enzyme. The undigested phosphate-rich phytic acid is then excreted as waste, contributing to environmental issues like algal blooms and water contamination.

Phytic acid, found abundantly in grains, is a form of phosphorus that pigs—and many other animals—cannot utilise because they lack the phytase enzyme to break it down. Without this enzyme, the phosphorus passes through the pigs' digestive system and is excreted, leading to the concentration of phosphate in the environment.

To combat this issue, pigs have been engineered to contain the E. coli appA gene, which enables them to produce phytase, the enzyme needed to digest phytic acid. This modification allows the pigs to break down the phytic acid in their diet, effectively reducing the amount of phosphate in their waste.

What makes this solution particularly innovative is the way the gene is expressed. The E. coli appA gene is under a promoter from a mouse, which regulates the expression of proteins in the mouse salivary gland. This means that the pig only produces the phytase enzyme in its saliva. This targeted expression ensures that the enzyme is active exactly where it needs to be—in the pig's mouth. As the pig chews and swallows, the phytase is mixed with the grain, breaking down the phytic acid before it can pass through the digestive system.

This genetic modification significantly lowers the levels of phosphate pollution associated with pig farming by reducing the amount of undigested phytic acid excreted by pigs. 

New Video: How Plants Are Fighting Climate Change and Pollution?

 In this video - How Plants Are Fighting Climate Change and Pollution? - I look at how plants are being used to help fight climate change and polution.

Genetically engineered plants are being explored to combat climate change and environmental pollution. 

Slowing Climate Change with Carbon-Capturing Plants

One area of research focuses on using plants to slow climate change by enhancing their ability to capture and store carbon. Plants have been engineered to produce suberin, a cork-like substance that resists degradation and effectively traps carbon. These plants are also being developed to grow deeper root systems, ensuring that the suberin (and the carbon it contains) is buried deep within the soil, where it can remain sequestered for long periods.

This carbon sequestration will help reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and slow global warming. 

Building Resilient Crops for a Changing Climate

As climate change continues to impact agricultural productivity, crops must be developed that can withstand extreme conditions such as heat, drought, disease, and high salinity. Researchers are working to make plants more resilient, ensuring that food supplies remain stable even as the environment becomes increasingly unpredictable.

By enhancing plants' natural defences, it is hoped that crops can be produced that can thrive in adverse conditions, reducing the risk of crop failures and food shortages.

Plants as Pollution Fighters

Plants are also being engineered to tackle pollution. 

A particularly interesting approach involves cloning the rabbit gene P4502E1 into Devil's Ivy, a popular houseplant. This gene encodes an enzyme that breaks down harmful chemicals, including potential carcinogens, into less toxic compounds. By introducing this gene into plants, researchers are creating a natural air purification system that can absorb and detoxify pollutants in urban environments and indoor spaces.

New Video: The genetically engineered mouse and COVID-19

 In this video - How Genetically Engineered Mice Help Us Study COVID-19 - I look at how a mouse that was genetically engineered for studying one virus, helped us understand COVID-19.

To develop effective treatments and vaccines for COVID-19, we needed to understand how the virus interacted with living organisms. For this, scientists typically use model organisms like mice. However, using mice for COVID-19 research presented a significant problem.

COVID-19, caused by a coronavirus, gains entry into human cells by binding to a specific receptor on the cell surface known as ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2). However, the ACE2 receptor in mice differs from the human version, making it impossible for the virus to bind to mouse cells. This meant that mice could not be used to study the virus in a living organism to better understand how it works and to test potential treatments.

Fortunately, genetic engineering provided a solution. 

Back in 2007, during the outbreak of another coronavirus, SARS, scientists developed a line of genetically engineered mice that express the human version of the ACE2 receptor. These “humanised” mice could be infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, making them an invaluable tool in the fight against the pandemic.

Using these genetically modified mice, researchers could study how COVID-19 interacted with cells, how it causes disease, and how different treatments might work in a living organism.

New Video: Gene Drives: A Powerful and Controversial Genetic Technology

In this video - Gene Drives: A Powerful and Controversial Genetic Technology - I look at gene drives. A genetic engineering technique that I find equally fascinating and scary.

Gene drives are a revolutionary and controversial advancement in genetic engineering. The process allows scientists to introduce self-propagating changes into an organism's genome, bypassing traditional Mendelian inheritance. By ensuring that specific mutations become homozygous in offspring, gene drives have the potential to rapidly spread these changes throughout populations.

The applications of gene drives are both promising and far-reaching. They could play a crucial role in eradicating mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria and Zika, which continue to claim millions of lives globally. Additionally, gene drives could help tackle drug-resistant fungal pathogens that pose a significant threat to human health and be employed to control or eliminate invasive species that disrupt ecosystems.

But how does this technology work? 

Gene drives use CRISPR, a gene-editing tool. In a gene drive, the CRISPR machinery is introduced along with the desired mutation. This machinery then actively copies itself onto the corresponding chromosome, ensuring the organism becomes homozygous for the mutation. This process allows the mutation to "drive" through the population, even if it does not provide a traditional selective advantage.

However, the power of gene drives comes with significant ethical concerns. The ability to alter ecosystems and species at such a fundamental level raises the question: Just because we can, should we? That is, once you introduce a change in a system using gene drive, how could you change or reverse it, or stop it spreading to other organisms?

CRISPR Case Studies: HIV resistant babies, cancer and blindness

In the video - CRISPR Case Studies: Ethical Dilemmas and Revolutionary Applications - I look at the illegal use of CRISPR on babies and its legal use to treat some conditions.

CRISPR has emerged as a powerful genetic engineering tool. However, it does come with the ethical implications.

CRISPR

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a gene-editing tool that allows scientists to alter DNA sequences within organisms. Using this technology, researchers can add, remove, or modify genetic material, leading to potential cures for genetic diseases, improved agricultural practices, and innovative solutions to environmental issues.

However, using CRISPR, especially in humans, raises significant ethical issues.

The CRISPR Babies

One of the most shocking uses of CRISPR on humans occurred when the genomes of human embryos were edited, leading to the birth of two genetically modified babies. The primary goal was to disable the CCR5 gene to produce babies that were HIV-resistant. That is, remove the receptor that HIV uses to enter human cells.

The CCR5 gene was selected because a naturally occurring mutation in this gene provides resistance to HIV and the Black Death in about 1% of Northern Europeans.

Researchers attempted to mimic this natural 32-base pair deletion using CRISPR, disrupting the CCR5 receptor's function and preventing HIV infection.

Outcomes and Concerns

The resulting edits did not replicate the exact natural mutation. One baby had a 15-base pair deletion in one copy of the gene, while the other had different insertions and deletions across both gene copies.

These unintended mutations raise serious health concerns as studies suggest that individuals with CCR5 mutations may have a 20% lower likelihood of reaching age 76 and could be more susceptible to other infections and diseases.

There is also the risk of off-target edits, where CRISPR inadvertently alters other parts of the genome, potentially leading to unforeseen health issues.

The scientific community widely condemned this work for its ethical breaches, lack of transparency, and disregard for established guidelines. The researchers involved faced legal consequences, including fines and imprisonment.

This case highlights the ethical dilemmas associated with germline editing:

• Consent: The edited changes are heritable, affecting future generations who cannot consent.
• Risk vs. Benefit: The potential health risks may outweigh the intended benefits, especially given existing alternatives to prevent HIV transmission.
• Regulatory Oversight: The need for strict guidelines and oversight in genetic editing research is evident to prevent misuse and ensure ethical compliance.

Promising and Legal Applications of CRISPR

CRISPR has the potential for legitimate and beneficial medical applications. Here are two examples:

1. Cancer Treatment

Treatment of testicular cancer resistant to conventional therapies.

Patient-derived T cells are collected and genetically modified using CRISPR to disrupt three specific genes that regulate T cell targeting. 

A lentivirus is then used to introduce a new targeting mechanism, directing the T cells to recognise and attack proteins unique to the patient's cancer cells.

The modified T cells are then reintroduced into the patient, aiming to boost the immune system's ability to fight cancer effectively.

This represents a personalised and targeted approach to cancer therapy and demonstrates CRISPR's potential to improve immunotherapy treatments.

2. Treating Childhood Blindness

CRISPR is also being used to address Leber Congenital Amaurosis 10 (LCA10), a cause of blindness in children.

The procedure targets the CEP290 gene, where specific mutations disrupt normal retinal development.

The CRISPR components are packaged into adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), and the system precisely removes the mutation in the CEP290 gene, aiming to restore proper protein function and improve vision.

Exploring Genetic Engineering: How It's Protecting Crops and Enhancing Food

In this video - Exploring Genetic Engineering: Protecting Crops and Enhancing Food - I look at three examples of how genetic engineering has been used to protect crops from insects and enhance the nutritional value of food.

1. BT Cotton: A Solution with Unintended Consequences

BT cotton is a prime example of how genetic engineering can provide a targeted solution to agricultural problems. This cotton variety has been engineered to produce a toxin derived from a specific type of bacteria. The toxin crystallises within the plant, and when an insect eats the leaves, the toxin dissolves the insect’s gut, eliminating the pest without the need for widespread insecticide use. This approach has the added benefit of protecting beneficial insects, as the crop itself becomes a selective defence mechanism.

However, this crop has had some unintended consequences. For example, in India, the high cost of BT cotton seeds has created a debt cycle for many farmers. Additionally, the market has seen a rise in counterfeit seeds, complicating the situation further. 

2. Venomous Cabbage: A Controversial Defense

I do like this one.... what made the researchers think of it?

The venomous cabbage - these cabbages have been modified to express scorpion venom in their leaves. The Diamondback moth larvae, notorious for damaging cabbage crops, eat the leaves of cabbages producing the venom and dying. Luckily, this venom is not toxic to humans, making the cabbage safe to eat.

Would you be comfortable eating such a cabbage?

3. Golden Rice: Tackling Vitamin A Deficiency

I was involved in a similar project - more about that in a later video.

Golden Rice represents a more human-centric approach to genetic engineering. This rice has been enriched with beta-carotene, a compound the human body can convert into vitamin A - making it a potent tool in the fight against vitamin A deficiency, which is prevalent in many parts of the world.

The rice owes its yellow colour to the addition of genes from daffodils and bacteria.

While Golden Rice has the potential to significantly improve public health, it also raises important questions. How do we feel about consuming a staple food that contains genes from other species? This case exemplifies the broader debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their role in our food supply.

What are your thoughts on these genetically engineered crops? Would you eat them? Let me know in the comments or comment on the video.

The Cavendish Banana Crisis: How CRISPR Could Save Our FavoUrite Fruit

I like bananas — there, I have said it. They are one of my go-to fruits. But did you know they are in danger of being wiped out and no longer available?

In this video - How CRISPR Could Save Bananas from Extinction | The Cavendish Crisis Explained -  I look at why bananas are in trouble and how genetic engineering may come to the rescue.

About 99% of bananas we eat come from a single strain known as the Cavendish. Unfortunately, this strain faces a threat that could wipe it out.

The Cavendish Banana: A Monoculture at Risk

As popular as it is, the Cavendish banana has a significant vulnerability. It's sterile, meaning it can’t reproduce through seeds like many other plants. Instead, it’s propagated through cuttings. While this has allowed us to produce vast quantities of genetically identical bananas, it also means that if a disease affects one plant, it can quickly spread to all Cavendish bananas worldwide.

Fusarium wilt tropical race 4, or TR4, is a fungus threatening to wipe out the Cavendish banana. TR4 attacks the plant's roots, eventually killing it. Because the Cavendish is sterile, traditional breeding methods can’t be used to introduce resistance to this fungus, making the banana especially vulnerable.

Worryingly, this isn’t the first time a banana strain has faced extinction due to a fungal disease. Before the Cavendish, the Gros Michel banana was the world's favourite. However, attacked by a different strain of Fusarium wilt, leading to its near-total disappearance from the market. The Cavendish was introduced as a replacement, but now it’s facing a similar fate.

How Can We Save the Cavendish Banana?

Traditional breeding can't be used as the Cavendish is sterile. Hence, scientists are using genetic engineering to save the banana. One of the most promising approaches involves tweaking the banana’s genome to make it resistant to TR4. 

One explored method is inserting a resistance gene from wild bananas into the Cavendish. The wild bananas have naturally evolved to resist the fungus, and by transferring their genes, we could give the Cavendish the same level of resistance.

However, an even more interesting approach would be to use CRISPR to make precise changes to the banana’s DNA. In the case of the Cavendish banana, CRISPR could be used to activate a gene that has been silenced but could provide resistance to TR4. Additionally, CRISPR could deactivate genes that make the Cavendish susceptible to the fungus.

Why CRISPR is a Game-Changer

The advantage of using CRISPR is that it doesn’t involve inserting foreign DNA into the banana. This means the resulting banana wouldn’t be considered transgenic, which could ease regulatory hurdles and public concerns about genetically modified organisms (GMOs).